|
|
|
| Clinical value of venous-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference combined with venous oxygen saturation monitoring in patients with septic shock |
| NI Shi-jiao |
| Department of Internal Medicine, Jingdezhen Second People′s Hospital |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the clinical value of venous-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (P[cva]CO2) and venous oxygen saturation（ScvO2） monitoring in septic shock.Methods From October 2018 to October 2020,86 patients with septic shock admitted to Jingdezhen Second People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province were selected as the research objects.They were divided into the control group （43 cases） and the treatment group （43 cases） using random number table method.Patients in the control group used ScvO2 level as the guiding target for fluid resuscitation, Pa tients in the treatment group used the individual ScvO2 level combined with P(cv-a)CO2 level as the guiding target for fluid resuscitation.Patients in both groups were continuously observed for 28 days after fluid resuscitation for 6 hours.the treatment of the two groups of patients, physiological indicators, lactic acid clearance rate and prognosis before fluid resuscitation and 6 hours after fluid resuscitation were compared.Results The length of stay in the treatment group was shorter than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）; the dosage of Nore pinephrine of the treatment group was less than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant（P＜0.05）.After 6 hours of resuscitation, the central venous pressure （CVP）, mean arterial pressure （MAP）, and ScvO2 levels of the two groups were higher than those before resuscitation, and the CVP, ScvO2 levels and lactate clearance rate of the treatment group were higher than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant（P＜0.05）.There was no statistically significant difference in MAP level between the two groups of patients after 6 hours of fluid resuscitation （P＞0.05）; the differences in the incidence of pulmonary edema and mortality within 28 days between the two groups were not statistically significant （P＞0.05）.Conclusion P（cv-a）CO2 combined with ScvO2 is used as a monitoring indicator to guide patients with septic shock to perform fluid resuscitation,which can effectively improve the quality of fluid resuscitation, improve the treatment effect, shorten the hospital stay, reduce the amount of related medications, and the incidence of pulmonary edema after fluid resuscitation no increase, good security.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [4] |
孙光英，杨丽，雷冬梅，等.细节护理干预在感染性休克患者中的应用效果[J].中华现代护理杂志，2020，26（3）：404-408.
|
| [5] |
程书立，柳彩侠，许继元.中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差/动脉-中心静脉氧含量差在脓毒症休克患者复苏中的指导作用[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志，2020，15（1）：71-74.
|
| [3] |
杨阳，王兆，陈微微，等.老年感染性休克患者微循环高乳酸血症及预后的评估价值[J].中华老年医学杂志，2020，39（12）：1447-1451.
|
| [1] |
王建军，董海山，温丽荣.入院时心力衰竭对感染性休克患者预后的影响[J].中国急救医学，2018，38（1）：26-30.
|
| [2] |
方红龙，陈娟，罗建，等.经皮-动脉血二氧化碳分压差在脓毒性休克液体复苏中的变化及意义[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志，2019，26（5）：529-532.
|
| [6] |
杨光承.实用临床治疗学[M].北京：北京科学技术出版社，2010：137-142.
|
| [7] |
邱海波，杨毅.2004 严重感染和感染性休克治疗指南概要[C]//中华急诊医学杂志社第三届组稿会暨急诊医学学术研讨会论文汇编，2004.
|
| [8] |
殷静静，郑瑞强，林华，等.持续肾脏替代治疗时机对感染性休克合并急性肾损伤患者预后的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志，2018，22（7）：63-66.
|
| [9] |
温慧兰，卢耀能，罗以娟，等.598 例感染性休克患者疾病谱分析[J].中国病案，2018，19（1）：42-44.
|
| [10] |
余超，刘大为，王小亭，等.微循环与氧代谢评估对感染性休克复苏后肾损伤评估的临床意义[J].中华内科杂志，2018，57（2）：123-128.
|
| [11] |
何莲，聂斌.PICCO 和CVP 监测在脓毒性休克并发心功能不全患者治疗中的应用价值[J].吉林大学学报（医学版），2018，44（5）：1030-1035.
|
| [12] |
唐慧京，骆雪萍，李观.静动脉血二氧化碳分压差指导感染性休克液体复苏研究[J].临床肺科杂志，2019，24（6）：1115-1118.
|
| [13] |
牛杏果，张思森，焦宪法，等.ScvO2联合P（cv-a）CO2监测在感染性休克患者液体复苏中的指导意义及对预后的影响[J].中国急救医学，2019，39（10）：939-944.
|
| [14] |
罗真春，刘祺，李世琪，等.血管外肺水联合P（cv-a）CO2/C（a-cv）O2在脓毒性休克早期治疗中的应用研究[J].重庆医科大学学报，2019，44（3）：125-129.
|
| [15] |
艾辉，韩若东，颜秀侠，等.感染性休克患者愈后并发早期认知功能障碍的相关因素分析[J].中华全科医学，2020，18（4）：58-61.
|
| [16] |
顾晓蕾，张碧波，邵杰，等.中心静脉-动脉血二氧化碳分压差联合乳酸清除率对感染性休克复苏指导意义的研究[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志，2018，13（2）：145-148.
|
|
|
|
