血栓弹力图在妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症中的变化及意义

摘要
图/表
参考文献(22)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (564 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨血栓弹力图（TEG）在妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症（ICP）的变化及意义。方法回顾性收集2018年1月至2020年8月安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院妇产科确诊的87 例ICP 患者的病例资料作为ICP 组，并将其进一步分为轻度ICP 组和重度ICP 组，另收集同期健康孕妇100 例作为健康对照组，比较各组间的TEG 指标。结果 ICP组TEG 指标中反应时间（R）、最大振幅（MA）均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），两组其他TEG 指标比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。重度ICP 组TEG 指标中的R 高于轻度ICP 组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），两组其他TEG 指标间比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。重度ICP 组TEG 指标中R 和MA 均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），两组其他TEG 指标比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。轻度ICP 组TEG 指标与对照组比较，差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论TEG 指标能全面反映ICP 患者凝血状态的变化，一定程度上也可反映其病情的严重性，从而为病情评估及治疗提供重要的依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	梁丽丽
	尹绪爱

关键词 ：血栓弹力图, 妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症, 凝血功能, 病情评估

Abstract：Objective To investigate the changes and significance of thrombelastogram (TEG) in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). Methods A total of 87 cases of ICP diagnosed in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from January 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively collected as the ICP group, and further divided into the mild ICP group and the severe ICP group. Another 100 healthy pregnant women during the same period were collected as the healthy control group, and the TEG indicators among the groups were compared. Results The reaction time (R) and maximum amplitude (MA) of TEG indexes in ICP group were higher than those in control group, the differences were statistical significance (P＜0.05), but there were no statistical significances in other TEG indexes between the two groups (P＞0.05). The R of TEG indexes in severe ICP group was higher than that in mild ICP group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05), but there were no significant differences in other TEG indexes between the two groups (P＞0.05). The R and MA of TEG indexes in severe ICP group were higher than those in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05), but there were no significant differences in other TEG indexes between the two groups (P＞0.05). There were no significant differences in TEG indexes between mild ICP group and control group (P＞0.05). Conclusion TEG index can fully reflect the changes of coagulation status of ICP patients and reflect the severity of their disease to a certain extent, thus providing an important basis for the evaluation and treatment of the disease.

Key words： Thrombelastogram Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy Coagulation function Gevaluating severity

引用本文:

梁丽丽，尹绪爱. 血栓弹力图在妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症中的变化及意义[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(24): 76-79.
LIANG Lili，YIN Xu′ai. Changes and significance of thrombelastogram in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(24): 76-79.

链接本文:

https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2022/V29/I24/76

[1]	Gao XX，Ye MY，Liu Y，et al.Prevalence and risk factors of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in a Chinese population[J].Sci Rep，2020，10（1）：16307.
[2]	Jurk SM，Kremer AE，Schleussner E.Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd，2021，81（8）：940-947.
[3]	Ovadia C，Williamson C.Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy：Recent advances[J].Clin Dermatol，2016，34（3）：327-334.
[4]	Gui R，Huang XY，Zhou M，et al.Establishment of the normal reference range of thrombelastogram among the healthy population and pregnants in China[J].Iran J Public Health，2019，48（5）：841-848.
[5]	谢幸，孔北华，段涛.妇产科学[M].9 版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2018：92-93.
[6]	Dong C，Gu XQ，Chen F，et al.The variation degree of coagulation function is not responsible for extra risk of hemorrhage in gestational diabetes mellitus[J].J Clin Lab Anal，2019，34（4）：e23129.
[7]	Yin XJ，Yang ZH.Efficacy of nifedipine tablets plus aspirin in patients with gestational hypertension and the effect on coagulation function and hemorheology[J].Am J Transl Res，2021，13（6）：7059-7064.
[8]	Liu BY，Jian YL，Zhong M，et al.Value of coagulation function and fibrinolytic system assessment in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao，2007，27（1）：35-37.
[9]	Hagenbeck C，Hamza A，Kehl S，et al.Management of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy：Recommendations of the working group on obstetrics and prenatal medicine-section on maternal disorders[J].Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd，2021，81（8）：922-939.
[10]	Maldonado M，Alhousseini A，Awadalla M，et al.Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy leading to severe vitamin K deficiency and coagulopathy[J].Case Rep Obstet Gynecol，2017，2017：5646247.
[11]	Mikolasevic I，Filipec -Kanizaj T，Jakopcic I，et al.Liver disease during pregnancy：A challenging clinical issue[J].Med Sci Monit，2018，24：4080-4090.
[12]	DeLeon A，De Oliveira GS，Kalayil M，et al.The incidence of coagulopathy in pregnant patients with intrahepatic cholestasis：Should we delay or avoid neuraxial analgesia?[J].J Clin Anesth，2014，26（8）：623-627.
[13]	钟昌莉，张本蓉，张文龙，等.血栓弹力图评估新型冠状病毒肺炎患者凝血功能的临床价值[J].中国输血杂志，2021，34（8）：864-867.
[14]	Li Y，Chang HL，Ni L，et al.Analysis of thrombelastogramguided medication in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Exp Ther Med，2019，17（4）：3047-3052.
[15]	卢雪景，秦丽欣，梁建梅，等.低分子肝素治疗血栓前状态导致的复发性流产患者的疗效和血栓弹力图的应用价值[J].中国妇幼保健，2021，36（16）：3761-3764.
[16]	Marschall HU.Management of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J].Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol，2015，9（10）：1273-1279.
[17]	Phillips C，Boyd M.Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy[J].Nurs Womens Health，2015，19（1）：46-57.
[18]	Jiang M，Li Y，Zhang B，et al.Urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites associated with changes in clinical hemostatic and hematologic parameters in pregnant women[J].Environ Int，2018，120：34-42.
[19]	Bacq Y，Sentilhes L.Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy：Diagnosis and management[J].Clin Liver Dis（Hoboken），2014，4（3）：58-61.
[20]	代琼，于晓，张涛，等.血栓弹力图与常规凝血试验应用于脑血管疾病患者检测的相关分析[J].中国输血杂志，2021，34（7）：724-727.
[21]	Oztas E，Erkenekli K，Ozler S，et al.Can routine laboratory parameters predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy?[J].J Perinat Med，2015，43（6）：667-674.
[22]	Cho SY，Lee HJ，Park TS.Mean platelet volume in patients with increased γ-glutamyl transferase[J].Platelets，2015，26（3）：283-284.