Abstract:Objective To compare the application value of thromboelastogram (TEG) and routine coagulation test (CCT)in the guidance of clinical rational blood use.Methods A total of 83 patients with indications for blood transfusion who underwent TEG and CCT in Xiamen Fifth Hospital from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected.All patients underwent TEG,CCT and blood plate count (PLTs).The TEG and CCT results and there correlation were analyzed and the application value of TEG and CCT in the guidance of clinical rational blood use were compared.Results The blood clot formation time (K) was (3.92±1.08) min,reaction time (R) was (10.58±4.16) min,maximum amplitude (MA) was (42.34±10.92) mm,α-Angle (Angle) was (50.76±9.05)°,fibrinogen (FIB) was (2.03±0.85) g/L,prothrombin time (PT) was(16.41±5.36) s,activated partial prothrombin time (APTT) was (42.59±17.74) s,PLTs was (123.58±41.62)×109/L of 83 patients.K value was negatively correlated with FIB (P<0.05).R was negatively correlated with FIB and positively correlated with PT and APTT (P<0.05).MA was positively correlated with FIB and PLTs (P<0.05).Angle was positively correlated with FIB and PLTs (P<0.05).Under the guidance of TEG,platelet volume,plasma volume and cryoprecipitate volume were less than those of CCT,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion There is a correlation between TEG and CCT.TEG examination is conducive to the complete and dynamic evaluation of the whole process of coagulation and the guidance of clinical rational blood use.In clinical work,TEG and CCT can be combined to objectively and accurately evaluate the coagulation state of patients and optimize the blood transfusion scheme of patients.
谷瑞霖. 血栓弹力图与常规凝血试验在临床合理用血指导中的应用价值比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(17): 170-172转176.
GU Ruilin. Comparison of thromboelastogram and routine coagulation test in the guidance of clinical rational blood use. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(17): 170-172转176.