中国当代医药
中国当代医药杂志欢迎您 今天是   2025年4月8日星期二
设为首页  加入收藏  联系我们         
 
      首 页    |    本刊简介     |    期刊荣誉     |    编采团队     |    会务培训     |    理事单位     |    下载专区     |    在线留言     |    联系我们     |     返回中国当代医药网
中国当代医药  2022, Vol. 29 Issue (10): 128-131    
  临床药学 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
氯沙坦与卡托普利治疗高血压肾病的临床效果比较
林秀娟1 陈金灶2 郑丽如2
1.福建省莆田市第一医院胸心外科,福建莆田 351100;
2.福建省莆田市第一医院心血管内科,福建莆田 351100
Comparisons of the clinical effect of Losartan and Captopril in the treatment of hypertensive nephropathy
LIN Xiujuan1 CHEN Jinzao2 ZHENG Liru2
1.Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,the First Hospital of Putian,Fujian Province,Putian 351100,China;
2.Department of Cardiology,the First Hospital of Putian,Fujian Province,Putian 351100,China
全文: PDF (416 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨氯沙坦与卡托普利治疗高血压肾病的临床效果。方法 选取2020年7月至2021年6月莆田市第一医院心血管内科收治的60 例高血压肾病患者作为研究对象,采用随机抽签法将其分为氯沙坦组和卡托普利组,每组各30 例。两组患者分别采用氯沙坦和卡托普利治疗高血压肾病。比较两组患者治疗前后的收缩压与舒张压、治疗前后估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、治疗前后eGFR 的差值(△eGFR)、治疗期间的不良反应总发生率。统计两组患者的血肌酐,并通过血肌酐估算eGFR。结果 治疗前,两组患者的收缩压、舒张压、eGFR 比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的收缩压均低于本组治疗前,且氯沙坦组低于卡托普利组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的舒张压均低于本组治疗前,且氯沙坦组低于卡托普利组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的eGFR 均高于本组治疗前,且氯沙坦组高于卡托普利组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,氯沙坦组的△eGFR 高于卡托普利组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。氯沙坦组不良反应总发生率(13.30%)低于卡托普利组(36.70%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.037)。结论 从降压及改善肾功能的效果来看,卡托普利及氯沙坦两种药物均可有效降压和减轻肾功能损害,从而阻止肾病的进展。两种药物均能够降压,改善肾功能,降低药物不良反应发生率,氯沙坦治疗高血压肾病的效果优于卡托普利。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
林秀娟
陈金灶
郑丽如
关键词 高血压肾病氯沙坦卡托普利肾小球滤过率    
Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effects of Losartan and Captopril in the treatment of hypertensive nephropathy.Methods A total of 60 patients with hypertensive nephropathy admitted to the Department of Cardiology of the First Hospital of Putian From July 2020 to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects,they were divided into Losartan group and Captopril group by drawing lots method,with 30 cases in each group.Two groups of patients were treated with Losartan and Captopril respectively.The systolic and diastolic blood pressures,estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR),the difference between the eGFR(△eGFR)before and after treatment and the total incidence of complications during the treatment were compared between the two groups.The blood creatinine levels of the two groups were collected and were used for the calculations of the eGFR.Results Before treatment,there were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,and eGFR between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the systolic blood pressure of the two groups was lower than that before treatment,and the systolic blood pressure of the Losartan group was lower than that of the Captopril group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the diastolic blood pressure of the two groups was lower than that before treatment,and the diastolic blood pressure of the Losartan group was lower than that of the Captopril group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the eGFR of the two groups was higher than that before treatment,and the eGFR of the Losartan group was higher than that of the Captopril group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,△eGFR in the Losartan group was higher than that of the Captopril group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).The total incidence of the complications in the Losartan group(13.30%)was lower than that in the Captopril group(36.70%),the difference was significant(P=0.037).Conclusion From the effect of lowering blood pressure and improving renal function,both drugs can reduce blood pressure,improve renal function and reduce the incidence of adverse drug reactions,thereby preventing the progression of renal disease.Losartan is better than Captopril in the treatment of hypertensive nephropathy.
Key wordsHypertensive nephropathy    Losartan    Captopril    Glomerular filtration rate
    
引用本文:   
林秀娟;陈金灶;郑丽如. 氯沙坦与卡托普利治疗高血压肾病的临床效果比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(10): 128-131.
LIN Xiujuan; CHEN Jinzao; ZHENG Liru. Comparisons of the clinical effect of Losartan and Captopril in the treatment of hypertensive nephropathy. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(10): 128-131.
链接本文:  
https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/     或     https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2022/V29/I10/128
中华人民共和国互联网药品信息服务资格证书(京)-非经营性-2016-0092
京ICP备11001767号-6  京公网安备 11010502046607号  互联网药品信息服务资格证  期刊出版许可证  广告经营许可证
信息产业部备案管理系统网址 http://beian.miit.gov.cn/state/outPortal/loginPortal.action
投稿热线:010-59626690 总机:010-59626692/18/19/20   传真:010-59626204   投稿信箱:ddyy@vip.163.com
地址:北京市朝阳区东四环中路78号楼(大成国际中心B1座)8B02室   邮编:100124
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
Copyright 2000-2014 版权所有 《中国当代医药》杂志社 未经授权请勿转载