中国当代医药
中国当代医药杂志欢迎您 今天是   2025年4月8日星期二
设为首页  加入收藏  联系我们         
 
      首 页    |    本刊简介     |    期刊荣誉     |    编采团队     |    会务培训     |    理事单位     |    下载专区     |    在线留言     |    联系我们     |     返回中国当代医药网
中国当代医药  2022, Vol. 29 Issue (4): 115-119    
  神经与精神疾病 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
齐拉西酮联合西酞普兰治疗首发精神分裂症患者的效果
林雪飞
江苏省徐州市广慈医院精神科,江苏徐州 221400
Effect of Ziprasidone combined with Citalopram in the treatment of patients with first-episode schizophrenia
LIN Xuefei
Department of Psychiatry, Xuzhou Guangci Hospital, Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou 221400, China
全文: PDF (559 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨齐拉西酮和西酞普兰治疗首发精神分裂症患者的效果。方法 选取2018年1月至2020年1月在徐州市广慈医院就诊的68 例首发精神分裂症患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组各34 例。对照组给予齐拉西酮治疗,观察组给予齐拉西酮联合西酞普兰治疗,治疗8 周后观察两组的治疗效果、执行功能及眼运动功能。结果 治疗前两组的阳性及阴性症状量表(PANSS)各项评分及总分、眼动功能、执行功能比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗4 周后两组的阴性症状、精神病理、总分评分均低于治疗前,且观察组的阴性症状、精神病理、总分评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗8 周后两组的PANSS 各项评分及总分均低于治疗前及治疗4 周后,且观察组的PANSS 各项评分及总分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗8 周后两组的眼注视点(NEF)和反应性探索评分(RSS)评分均高于治疗前,差别分析值(D 分值)低于治疗前,且观察组的NEF 与RSS 评分高于对照组,D 分值低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗8 周后两组患者的总测验次数、持续错误数以及随机错误数均低于治疗前,正确反应数及分类完成数高于治疗前,且观察组的总测验次数、持续错误数以及随机错误数低于对照组,正确反应数及分类完成数高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的不良反应比较,差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 齐拉西酮联合西酞普兰对首发精神分裂症患者的治疗效果较好,可显著改善PANSS 各项评分,改善患者的执行功能、眼动功能,并且不良反应较少,在临床上可广泛使用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
林雪飞
关键词 齐拉西酮西酞普兰首发精神分裂症效果    
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of Ziprasidone and Citalopram in the treatment of patients with firstepisode schizophrenia. Methods A total of 68 patients with first-episode schizophrenia who were treated at Xuzhou Guangci Hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected and divided into the observation group and the control group according to a random number table, with 34 cases in each group. The control group were treated with Ziprasidone, and the observation group were provided with Ziprasidone combined with Citalopram. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect, executive function and eye movement function of the two groups were observed. Results There were no significant differences in the scores of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) and total score,eye movement function, or executive function between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, the negative symptoms score, psychopathology score and total score of the two groups were lower than before treatment, and the negative symptoms score, psychopathology score and total score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment,PANSS scores and total score in both groups were lower than before and 4 weeks after treatment, and PANSS scores and total scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment, the number of eye fixation (NEF) and responsive search score (RSS)scores in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and discriminant analysis (D) score was lower than that before treatment, the NEF and RSS scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group,and the D score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05).After 8 weeks of treatment, the total number of tests, the number of continuous errors, and the number of random errors of the two group were lower than those before treatment, the number of correct responses and the number of completed classifications were higher than those before treatment and the total number of tests, the number of continuous errors,and the number of random errors in the observation group were lower than that in the control group, the number of correct responses and the number of classification completed in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, with statistical significances (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Ziprasidone combined with Citalopram is effective in the treatment of patients with first-episode schizophrenia. It can significantly improve the PANSS score, the executive function and eye movement function of the patients, and has fewer adverse reactions, which can be widely used in clinical.
Key wordsZiprasidone    Citalopram    First-episode schizophrenia    Effect
    
引用本文:   
林雪飞. 齐拉西酮联合西酞普兰治疗首发精神分裂症患者的效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(4): 115-119.
LIN Xuefei. Effect of Ziprasidone combined with Citalopram in the treatment of patients with first-episode schizophrenia. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(4): 115-119.
链接本文:  
https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/     或     https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2022/V29/I4/115
中华人民共和国互联网药品信息服务资格证书(京)-非经营性-2016-0092
京ICP备11001767号-6  京公网安备 11010502046607号  互联网药品信息服务资格证  期刊出版许可证  广告经营许可证
信息产业部备案管理系统网址 http://beian.miit.gov.cn/state/outPortal/loginPortal.action
投稿热线:010-59626690 总机:010-59626692/18/19/20   传真:010-59626204   投稿信箱:ddyy@vip.163.com
地址:北京市朝阳区东四环中路78号楼(大成国际中心B1座)8B02室   邮编:100124
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
Copyright 2000-2014 版权所有 《中国当代医药》杂志社 未经授权请勿转载