中国当代医药
中国当代医药杂志欢迎您 今天是   2025年4月5日星期六
设为首页  加入收藏  联系我们         
 
      首 页    |    本刊简介     |    期刊荣誉     |    编采团队     |    会务培训     |    理事单位     |    下载专区     |    在线留言     |    联系我们     |     返回中国当代医药网
中国当代医药  2022, Vol. 29 Issue (24): 19-22    
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
三种疗法在幽门螺杆菌阳性患者中的应用效果比较
徐春波
江苏省南通市通州区人民医院消化科,江苏南通 226300
Comparison of application effect of three therapies in Helicobacter pylori positive patients
XU Chunbo
Department of Gastroenterology, Tongzhou District People′s Hospital, Jiangsu Province, Nantong 226300, China
全文: PDF (541 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨铋剂四联疗法、序贯疗法、伴同疗法在幽门螺杆菌(Hp)阳性患者中的应用效果。方法 选取2019年3月至2021年3月于南通市通州区人民医院就诊的127 例消化性溃疡与慢性胃炎患者为研究对象,所有患者接受胃镜检查确诊,且通过14C 尿素呼气试验检测方法确诊Hp 阳性,按照随机数字表法分为铋剂四联疗法组(n=43)、序贯疗法组(n=42)及伴同疗法组(n=42)。比较三组患者治疗后的Hp 根除率、临床症状的改善状况以及不良反应总发生率。 结果 意向性分析结果显示,序贯疗法组、铋剂四联组、伴同疗法组的Hp 根除率分别为69.05%、79.07%、85.71%,三组患者的Hp 根除率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 符合方案集结果显示,序贯疗法组、铋剂四联疗法组、伴同疗法组的Hp 根除率分别为73.68%、87.5%、94.87%,三组的Hp 根除率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中伴同疗法组的Hp 根除率高于序贯疗法组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.017)。 治疗前三组患者的症状评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,三组患者的症状评均高于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但三组间患者的症状评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 序贯治疗组、铋剂四联疗法组、伴同治疗组患者治疗后的不良反应总发生率分别为19.05%(8/42)、16.28%(7/43)、38.1%(16/42), 三组患者的不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 伴同疗法的Hp 根除率最佳,三种疗法对症状改善效果相当,且安全性均较高。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐春波
关键词 幽门螺杆菌铋剂序贯疗法伴同疗法    
Abstract:Objective To explore the application effect of bismuth containing quadruple therapy, sequential therapy and concomitant therapy in Helicobacter pylori (Hp) positive patients. Methods A total of 127 patients with peptic ulcer and chronic gastritis treated in Tongzhou District People′s Hospital of Nantong city from March 2019 to March 2021 were selected as the research subjects. All patients were confirmed by gastroscopy and positive for Hp by 14C urea breath test. According to random number table method, they were divided into bismuth quadruple therapy group (n=43),sequential therapy group (n=42) and companion therapy group (n=42). Hp eradication rate, improvement of clinical symptoms and total incidence of adverse reactions were compared among three groups after treatment. Results The results of intentional analysis showed that the Hp eradication rates of the sequential therapy group, the bismuth quadruple group and the companion therapy group were 69.05%, 79.07% and 85.71%, respectively. There was no statistical significance in the Hp eradication rates of the three groups (P>0.05). According to the results of the protocol set, the Hp eradication rates of the sequential therapy group, the bismuth quadruple therapy group and the companion therapy group were 73.68%, 87.5% and 94.87%, respectively, and the difference of Hp eradication rates among three groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The Hp eradication rate in the companion therapy group was higher than that in the sequential therapy group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.017). There was no statistical significance in symptom scores of the three groups before treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the symptom scores of patients in the three groups were higher than before, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the symptom scores of patients in the three groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions after treatment was 19.05% (8/42) in the sequential treatment group, 16.28% (7/43) in the bismuth quadruple therapy group and 38.1% (16/42) in the companion treatment group, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Companion therapy had the best Hp eradication rate, and the three treatments had similar symptom improvement effects with high safety.
Key wordsHelicobacter pylori    Bismuth agent    Sequential therapy    Companion therapy
    
引用本文:   
徐春波. 三种疗法在幽门螺杆菌阳性患者中的应用效果比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(24): 19-22.
XU Chunbo. Comparison of application effect of three therapies in Helicobacter pylori positive patients. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(24): 19-22.
链接本文:  
https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/     或     https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2022/V29/I24/19
中华人民共和国互联网药品信息服务资格证书(京)-非经营性-2016-0092
京ICP备11001767号-6  京公网安备 11010502046607号  互联网药品信息服务资格证  期刊出版许可证  广告经营许可证
信息产业部备案管理系统网址 http://beian.miit.gov.cn/state/outPortal/loginPortal.action
投稿热线:010-59626690 总机:010-59626692/18/19/20   传真:010-59626204   投稿信箱:ddyy@vip.163.com
地址:北京市朝阳区东四环中路78号楼(大成国际中心B1座)8B02室   邮编:100124
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
Copyright 2000-2014 版权所有 《中国当代医药》杂志社 未经授权请勿转载