|
|
Influence of cooperative nursing intervention on negative emotion,hip joint function and quality of life of elderly patients after total hip rep lacement |
XIAO Li-ping |
Department of Nursing,Jinggangshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Jiangxi Province,Jinggangshan 343600,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the influence of cooperative nursing intervention on negative emotion,hip joint function and quality of life of elderly patients after total hip replacement(THA).Methods From March 2018 to March 2019,60 elderly patientswho underwent THA in our hospitalwere selected as the study objects,and they were divided into the control group and the intervention group by the random number tablemethod,30 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were given routine nursing,and the patients in the intervention group were given cooperative nursing intervention on the basis of the control group.The depression,anxiety scores,hip joint function scores and quality of life scoreswere compared between the two groups at 1,3and 6months after intervention.Results The scores of depression and anxiety in the two groups at 1,3and 6months after intervention were lower than those before intervention,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The scores of depression and anxiety in the two groups at3and 6months after intervention were lower than those at 1month after intervention,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The scores of depression and anxiety in the two groups at 6months after intervention were lower than those at 3months after intervention,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The scores of depression and anxiety in the observation group at 1,3and 6months after intervention were lower than those in the control group,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The Harris hip joint function score and SF-36score of the two groups at 3and 6months after intervention were higher than those at 1month after intervention,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The Harris hip joint function score and SF-36score in the two groups at 6months after intervention were higher than those at 3months after intervention,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The SF-36score of the two groups at 1,3and 6months after intervention were higher than those before intervention,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The Harris hip joint function score and SF-36score in the observation group at 1,3and 6months after intervention were higher than those in the control group,with statistical differences(P<0.05).Conclusion Cooperative nursing intervention can significantly improve the negative emotions,hip joint function and quality of life of the elderly patients after THA,which isworthy of clinical promotion and application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
潘玉贞,曾晓颖,林侃侃,等.延续功能康复训练对社区老年全髋关节置换术后患者机体康复的影响[J].国际医药卫生导报,2017,23(11):1795-1798.
|
[2] |
李程.微信形式的延续性护理在全髋关节置换术后患者康复期的应用研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2018.
|
[3] |
安佩芳.基于协同护理模式的舒适护理干预对冠心病患者焦虑状态和护理满意度的影响[J].河北医药,2018,40(4):628-631.
|
[4] |
张雪玲.一对一授权教育联合协同护理模式对慢性乙型肝炎患者自护能力及自我效能感的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(10):217-219.
|
[5] |
陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
|
[6] |
杜姣.心理痛苦温度计在脑卒中患者中的应用研究[D].南充:川北医学院,2018.
|
[7] |
江尚燕,李惠萍,李伦兰,等.微信视频随访对人工髋关节置换术后居家患者功能康复的效果研究[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(29):102-106,110.
|
[8] |
马娥,杨明莹,吴光柳,等.延续护理对老年髋关节置换术后患者生活质量及心理状况的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2017,36(20):2754-2759.
|
[9] |
江伟霞,陈素花.出院后追踪护理干预对老年髋关节置换术患者生活质量的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2017,14(13):50-52.
|
[10] |
黄奎,袁飞飞,王红,等.SF-36量表用于中国大学生生活质量评价的信度与效度分析[J].安徽医药,2017,21(11):2002-2005.
|
[11] |
孙文广.浅谈髋关节置换手术的主要步骤及护理配合[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(37):231,234.
|
[12] |
李金龙,周凯,陈志,等.大直径股骨头金属对金属人工全髋关节置换术后中远期疗效评价及失败原因分析[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,31(2):144-149.
|
[13] |
肖卫东,喻爱喜,潘振宇,等.老年股骨颈骨折髋关节置换术时机选择与临床疗效及预后分析[J].河北医学,2019,25(4):119-124.
|
[14] |
李宁,罗汉文,涂泽松,等.不同剂量利伐沙班防治全髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成的效果比较[J].海南医学,2017,27(8):1250-1253.
|
[15] |
李继华,杨会,王婷,等.协同护理干预对老年全髋关节置换术出院患者的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2017,23(24):1-3.
|
[16] |
段伟.协同护理模式对人工全膝关节置换术后患者疼痛控制及康复锻炼的影响[D].银川:宁夏医科大学,2018.
|
[17] |
梁群飞,钟联凤,王志嫦,等.协同护理干预在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用价值研究[J].中国医学创新,2018,15(30):96-99.
|
[18] |
况丽,叶明.协同护理对人工全髋关节置换术患者自我护理及情绪的影响研究[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2018,27(6):672-674.
|
|
|
|