胸腔镜辅助下与开放式食管癌根治术的综合临床疗效对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (25 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract ObjectiveTo compre the comprehensive clinical efficacy of thoracoscopic assisted and open radical resection of esophageal carcinoma.MethodsFrom May 2014 to May 2017,62 patients with esophageal cancer diagnosed and treated in our hospital were selected as object,and they were divided into the study group (n=31)and reference group(n=31)according to the random number table method.The patients in the reference group were treated with traditional open radical resection of esophageal cancer,and the patients in the study group were treated with thoracoscopic assisted radical resection of esophageal carcinoma.The operation time,the length of stay,the number of lymph node dissection and the amount of bleeding during operation,the drainage volume of after 24 h operation,the degree of chest pain after 36 h operation,and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference of the operation time and the number of lymph node dissection in patients between the two groups (P＞0.05).The length of stay in patients of the study group was significantly shorter than that in the reference group,the amount of bleeding during operation,the drainage volume of after 24 h operation in patients of the study group were significantly fewer than those of the control group,the chest pain score after 36 h operation in patients of the study group was significantly lower than that in the reference group,and there was a statistical difference(P＜0.05).Conclusionthoracoscopic assisted and open radical resection of esophageal carcinoma has a characteristics of small trauma,few bleeding amount,faster postoperative recovery,and can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative complications,compared with open radical operation of esophageal cancer,the advantages are more obvious,and it is worthy of widely promotion and application in clinic.

Key words： Thoracoscope Radical resection of esophageal cancer Clinical efficacy

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHANG Hui-wen
	ZHANG Ya-jun
	SONG Jian-xiang
	SHI Zhan

Cite this article:

CHANG Hui-wen,ZHANG Ya-jun,SONG Jian-xiang, et al. Comprehensive clinical efficacy comparison of thoracoscopic assisted and open radical resection of esophageal carcinoma[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(2): 50-52.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I2/50

[1]	郭明发，徐美青，魏大中.电视胸腔镜在食管癌根治手术中的应用[J].安徽医学，2011，32（3）：265-266.
[2]	韩福顺.胸腔镜食管癌根治术与开放式食管癌根治术的疗效对比[J].中国处方药杂志，2014，12（10）：99-100.
[3]	郑春鹏，傅俊惠，吴智勇，等.胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌切除术 10 例[J].中国微创外科杂志，2010，10（7）：581-583.
[4]	陈保富，朱成楚，王春国，等.胸腔镜腹腔镜联合手术与开放手术治疗食管癌的同期临床对照研究[J].中华外科杂志，2010，48（16）：1206-1209.
[5]	杨金云，张晓雨，平洪，等.42例胸腔镜食管癌切除术的临床经验[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志，2013，5（2）：125-126..
[6]	罗学平，莫春生，姚维深.全胸腔镜下与传统食管切除术治疗食管癌临床对比分析[J].新医学，2013，44（12）：854-855.
[7]	Edge SB，Byrd DR，Compton CC，et al.AJCC cancer stageing manua[M].7thed.New York：Springer，2009：103-116.
[8]	孙启峰，彭传亮，赵小刚，等.胸、腹腔镜联合治疗食管癌手术的临床分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志，2010，12（1）：121.
[9]	管宏俊，陈云琦，孙长鹏，等.电视胸腔镜食管癌切除术的疗效分析[J].中国临床医学，2014，21（2）：156-157.
[10]	王烨铭，徐震壮，吴小波，等.胃管状成形术在手辅助胸腔镜食管癌手术治疗中的应用观察[J].山东医药，2011，51（34）：88-89.
[11]	郭伟，龚太乾，蒋耀光，等.366例电视胸腔镜食管癌切除术中及术后并发症分析[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志，2014，3（30）：145-148.
[12]	张培龙，王雪峰.胸腔镜辅助食管癌根治术与传统开胸食管癌根治术临床分析[J].包头医学院学报，2015，4（31）：66-67.
[13]	杜仕建，张秀琼.胸腔镜辅助小切口食管癌根治术的临床效果观察[J].四川医学，2011，33（10）：1633-1634.
[14]	殷家永，赵健.传统根治术与胸腔镜辅助对于食管癌患者的治疗效果对比[J].吉林医学，2014，11（26）：5845-5847.
[15]	杜贾军，王黎光.胸腔镜食管癌切除术[J].腹腔镜外科杂志，2011，16（12）：884-886.
[16]	谷彪，吕俊杰，钟胜，等.胸腔镜与开放食管癌根治术的临床价值比较[J].中国现代药物应用，2015，9（23）：55-56.