|
|
The effects of the production process guided by new production standard on primipara and mother-infant ending |
HUANG Li-li LI Wen-min |
Department of Obstetrics,Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Jiangmen City,Guangdong Province,Jiangmen 529300,China |
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo discuss the effects of the production process guided by new production standard on primipara and Mother-infant ending.Methods Five hundred patients with primiparar were selected from June 2015 and June 2016 in our hospital,according to the random number table methods,all patients were divided into new standard group(250 cases)and old standard group(250 cases),old standard group was treated with the production process guided by old production standard,new standard group was treated with the production process guided by new production standard,compare two groups of deal with production,mother-infant ending.Results The first,second,and total production time of the new standard group was significantly higher than that of the old standard group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The rate of cesarean section,postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum fever of the new standard group were significantly lower than that of the old group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Neonatal asphyxiation rate and neonatal NICU rate of the new standard group and old standard group were basically the same,the differences were no statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the old production standard,the process of production process guided by new production standard can effectively improve the quality of birth process,and improve the outcome of primary mothers,does not increase the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes,it′s worth for further clinical promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
刘丽英,潘菊英.分阶段体位管理联合自主屏气用力对初产妇第二产程和分娩结局的影响[J].中国医药科学,2016,6(16):107-109.
|
[2] |
谢靖,金仙玉.产程标准变化对分娩影响的临床病例分析[J].大连医科大学学报,2015,37(6):583-588.
|
[3] |
Lowe NK.The overuse of cesarean delivery[J].J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs,2013,42(2):135-136.
|
[4] |
黄利川.新产程第二产程标准临床应用观察[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(8):102-104.
|
[5] |
钱夏柳,詹泽森,覃惠凤,等.以新产程标准为指导的产程处理对分娩结局的影响研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(15):1845-1848.
|
[6] |
危玲,闫亭亭,范玲.8025例阴道分娩人群新旧产程管理下分娩及妊娠结局比较[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2017,25(7):459-462.
|
[7] |
徐静,马彦彦.初产妇头位难产诊断中新旧产程图的对比研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,9(4):34-37.
|
[8] |
胡艳英.新产程标准的临床应用及对产妇和新生儿预后的影响[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(17):101-102.
|
[9] |
Antonio F,Patel D.Role of cerebroplacental ratio for fetal assessment in prolonged pregnancy[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2013,42(2):196-200.
|
[10] |
刘杏花.新旧产程标准对分娩的影响分析[J].基层医学论坛,2016,20(30):4218.
|
[11] |
符静,苏雪,李倩.新旧产程标准管理对分娩和新生儿结局影响的分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(6):627-629.
|
[12] |
刘陆梅.新旧产程标准对分娩方式的影响[J].中国基层医药,2017,24(7):1107-1109.
|
[13] |
吕向红,陈楠,王彩霞.新产程标准对妇产科孕妇自然分娩及妊娠结局的影响[J].医药论坛杂志,2016,37(7):70-71.
|
[14] |
李容芳,徐燕媚,邓琼.新产程标准中活跃期拐点在初产妇与经产妇临床应用中的影响[J].热带医学杂志,2017,17(7):932-935.
|
[15] |
刘小凤,刘小雅,翟剑,等.自由体位分娩对产程及分娩方式的影响[J].中国当代医药,2015,22(13):116-118.
|
|
|
|