|
|
Curative effect of harmonic scalpel combined with milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy of mixed hemorrhoids on patients with stageⅢandⅣof mixed hemorrhoids |
ZHOU Jian GENG Yan HE Hai-rong |
Department of Surgery,Xingtan Hospital Affiliated to the First People′s Hospital of Shunde District in Foshan City of Guangdong Province,Foshan 528325,China |
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo investigate the curative effect of harmonic scalpel combined with milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy of mixed hemorrhoids treating patients with stageⅢandⅣof mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsClinical data of 76 patients with stageⅢandⅣ of mixed hemorrhoids treated in our hospital from July 2015 to August 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into the routine group(n=40)and the combined group(n=36)according to different operation modes.The routine group was treated with milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy while the combined group was treated with harmonic scalpel combined with milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy.The operative status (operative time,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative pain,anal edema and wound healing time)were compared between the two groups.All cases were followed up for 3-5 months after operation.The recurrence and anal stenosis were observed.ResultsThe operative time,intraoperative bleeding volume and wound healing time of the combined group were significantly shorter or less than those of the routine group (P<0.05).Cases withⅠ andⅡ degree of edema in the combined group were significantly fewer than the routine group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative pain(P>0.05).The recurrence rate showed no significant difference between the two groups (15.00%vs.5.56%)(P>0.05).The incidence of anal stenosis was significantly higher in the routine group than the combined group(20.00%vs.2.78%)(P<0.05).ConclusionCompared with traditional milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy,harmonic scalpel combined with milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy can significantly shorten the operation time and wound healing time,reduce the intraoperative bleeding volume,alleviate postoperative wound edge edema and reduce the postoperative complications such as anal stenosis in patients with stageⅢandⅣof mixed hemorrhoids.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组.痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463.
|
[2] |
项雄华,金海波,刘丽丽,等.超声多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术联合超声刀切除术治疗重度混合痔的临床疗效观察[J].中国医师进修杂志,2016,39(8):677-680.
|
[3] |
李毅,吴坚,李文忠,等.超声刀加皮桥缝合治疗重度脱垂性混合痔疗效观察[J].实用医院临床杂志,2014,5(3):127-128.
|
[4] |
刘涛.急性脾癌形混合痔外科治疗(附180例报告)[J].现代医用影像学,2015,24(5):867-868.
|
[5] |
美国结直肠外科医师协会标准化工作委员会,丁义江,皇甫少华,等.痔诊断和治疗指南(2010修订版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2012,11(3):243-247.
|
[6] |
刘扬,刘青,杨润清,等.PPH联合外剥内扎术及皮桥整形术治疗重度环状混合痔的临床疗效观察[J].中国普通外科杂志,2015,24(2):297-299.
|
[7] |
付欢欢,余苏萍.超声刀加皮桥横向转移治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效[J].世界华人消化杂志,2016,24(8):1293-1297.
|
[8] |
杨旭,王元钊,周惠芬,等.基于微创理念下超声刀混合痔切除术的临床研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2013,12(24):11 417-11 419.
|
[9] |
刘越军,张海磊,包巨太.FOCUS超声刀在混合痔手术中的应用及其临床疗效[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2016,19(12):1720-1723.
|
[10] |
茆海兵,冯若冰.超声刀手术与传统外剥内扎术治疗重度混合痔的临床疗效比较[J].医学临床研究,2016,33(11):2217-2219.
|
[11] |
黄斌,张玉茹,刘连成,等.超声刀痔切除术后帕瑞昔布钠的镇痛效果及安全性[J].山东医药,2016,56(11):61-62.
|
[12] |
冯铎,陶霖玉,徐菲,等.FOCUS超声刀在开放性甲状腺切除术中的临床应用[J].中国现代医学杂志,2013,23(13):78-80.
|
[13] |
陈玲,卢敏,何彩群,等.超声刀与电刀运用于混合痔术后对比观察与护理[J].岭南现代临床外科,2015,15(5):643-644.
|
[14] |
王小龙,郑学海,谢贻祥,等.PPH联合超声刀痔切除在重度混合痔中的临床观察[J].安徽医药,2015,19(8):1495-1498.
|
|
|
|