Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical effect between single-port laparoscopy and small inguinal incision in the treatment of pediatric hydrocele. Methods The clinical data of 633 children with hydrocele admitted to our hospital from June 2014 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,546 children were finally included.They were divided into laparoscopic group (303 cases) and open operation group (243 cases) according to different treatment methods.The single-port laparoscopic high ligation of double-line sheath process was performed in the laparoscopic group, while the small inguinal incision was performed in the open operation group.The operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization expense, total incidence rate of postoperative complications and recurrence rate of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time (unilateral [17.9±2.5]min, bilateral [27.7±2.6]min) of the laparoscopic group was shorter than that of the open operation group (unilateral [24.9±3.3]min, bilateral [40.8±3.1]min), the hospitalization time ([2.6±0.7]d) was shorter than that of the open operation group ([3.9±1.6]d), and the intraoperative blood loss ([1.2±0.4]ml) was less than that of the open operation group([2.2±1.0]ml),the hospitalization expense([6076.5±496.6]yuan)was higher than that of the open operation group([3665.1±444.3]yuan), and the total incidence rate of postoperative complications (0.7%) was lower than that of the open operation group (11.9%), the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).After 1 year of follow-up, the recurrence rate in the laparoscopic group (0.7%) was not significantly different from that in the open operation group (2.1%) (P＞0.05).Conclusion The single-port laparoscopic high ligation of double-line sheath process has obvious advantages over small inguinal incision in terms of effect and safety for pediatric hydrocele, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
陈锦荣； 陈文有； 王燕惠； 叶风光； 杨锋彬； 简紫微. 单孔腹腔镜与腹股沟小切口治疗小儿鞘膜积液的临床效果比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(15): 153-156.
CHEN Jin-rong； CHEN Wen-you； WANG Yan-hui； YE Feng-guang； YANG Feng-bin； JIAN Zi-wei. Clinical effect comparison between single-port laparoscopy and small inguinal incision in the treatment of pediatric hydrocele. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(15): 153-156.
Acer-Demir T，Ekenci BY，Ozer D，et al.Natural history and conservative treatment outcomes for hydroceles：a retrospective review of one center′s experience[J].Urology，2018，112：155-160.
[6]
Naji H，Ingolfsson I，Isacson D，et al.Decision making in the management of hydroceles in infants and children[J].Eur J Pediatr，2012，171（5）：807-810.
Lee S，Illei PB，Han JS，et al.Florid mesothelial hyperplasia of the tunica vajinalis mimicking malignant mesothelioma：a clinicopathologic study of 12 cases[J].Am J Surg Pathol，2014，38（1）：54-59.
Esposito C，Escolino M，Turrà F，et al.Current concepts in the management of inguinal hernia and hydrocele in pediatric patients in laparoscopic era[J].Semin Pediatr Surg，2016，25（4）：232-240.
京公网安备 11010502046607号