Clinical effect comparison of tissue-selecting therapy stapler and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids with stapler in the treatment of haemorrhoids
HOU Hui
Department of Anorectum，People's Hospital of Meizhou City in Guangdong Province，Meizhou 514021，China
Abstract：Objective To explore the clinical value of tissue-selecting therapy stapler (TST) and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids with stapler (PPH) on treating hemorrhoids.Methods From January 2013 to July 2014，100 patients with hemorrhoids admitted into our hospital were selected and divided into treatment group and control group by random number table.In the treatment group，TST was used，while in the control group，PPH was adopted.The therapeutic effect and adverse reaction were compared.Results In the treatment group，the average operative time，hospital stay at average，and mean wound healing time was greatly shorter than that in the control group respectively，with statistical differences(P＜0.05).Pain sensation 6，12，and 24 h after surgery in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group respectively，which displayed a statistical difference (P＜0.05).Follow up visits were carried out one month after surgery，there was no stricture of anus or anal incontinence occurred in the treatment group.In the control group，no anal incontinence was found，but two cases were presented with stricture of anus.Index finger could pass through in digital rectal examination.The shape of stool became fine，and could be defecated smoothly.After 3 months follow up visits，no case was recurred between two groups.Conclusion Effect of TST on treating hemorrhoids is superior to that by PPH，which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
侯辉. 开环式微创痔吻合术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗痔病的临床效果比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(3): 43-45.
HOU Hui. Clinical effect comparison of tissue-selecting therapy stapler and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids with stapler in the treatment of haemorrhoids. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(3): 43-45.
京公网安备 11010502046607号