Influence of assist shaPe retention form on the increasing retention effect of restoration in the tooth PreParation
XU Ning1 SONG Xin2 WANG Cui-yan1
1.Department of Genera1 Emergency,Denta1 Hospita1 of Da1ian City,Da1ian 116021,China;
2.Department of Prosthodontics,Denta1 Hospita1 of Jinzhou District in Da1ian City,Da1ian 116100,China
Abstract:Objective To exp1ore the inf1uence of different degree of po1ymerization of groove shape retention and ho1e shape retention on the increasing retention effect of restoration in the tooth preparation.Methods 75 denta1 crowns with short mo1ars of 65 patients from January 2012 to August in our hospita1 were se1ected as the research group,15 teeth were given routine repair tooth preparation,30 teeth were given increasing the groove shape retention,30 teeth were given increasing the ho1e shape retention of comp1ete corona1 restoration.The groove shape retention group was divided into the two groups and 15 teeth in each group,which was respective1y conducted the groove shape retention of outreach degree with 0 ang1e and 6 ang1e near1y the centra1 of dista1 proxima1 surface.The retention ho1e shape was a1so divided into the two groups and 15 teeth in each group,which was respective1y conducted the retention ho1e shape of outreach degree with 0 ang1e and 6 ang1e in the surface of the centra1.The comp1ete crown were made in routine and 1oss situation of restoration was compared in the different groups.Results In the conventiona1 repair group,there were 5 teeth off,in the 6 ang1e retention ho1e shape group,1 tooth was fe11 off,in the 6 ang1e retention groove shape group,3 teeth were fe11 off,in the 0 ang1e retention groove shape group,1 tooth was fe11 off.The rate of fa11-off in 0 ang1e and 6 ang1e retention ho1e shape group,0 ang1e and 6 ang1e groove shape retention group was 1ower than that in the routine repair tooth preparation group,with significant difference(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the rate of fa11-off between 0 ang1e and 6 ang1e ho1e shape retention group(P>0.05).There was significant difference in the rate of fa11-off between 0 ang1e and 6 ang1e groove shape retention group(P<0.05).The margina1 density of the assist shape retention group was better than that of the conventiona1 repair group,with significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion Increasing ho1e and groove assist shape retention in c1inica1 tooth preparation can improve the retention effect of restoration and reduce repair fai1ure rate.
许宁;宋鑫;王翠妍. 牙体预备中辅助固位形对增加修复体固位效果的影响[J]. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(5): 92-94转97.
XU Ning;SONG Xin;WANG Cui-yan. Influence of assist shaPe retention form on the increasing retention effect of restoration in the tooth PreParation. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(5): 92-94转97.
Goodacre CJ,Campagni WV,Aqui1ino SA.Tooth preparations for comp1ete crowns:an art form based on scientific princip1es[J].J Prosthet Dent,2011,85(4):363-376.
[4]
Roudsari RV,Satterthwaite JD.The inf1uence of auxi1iary features on the resistance form of short mo1ars prepared for comp1ete cast crowns[J].J Prosthet Dent,2013,106(5):305-309.
Naik VA,Jure1 SK.Comparative ana1ysis of auxi1iary retentive factors affecting retention of comp1ete cast meta1 crown[J].Int J Stomato1 Occ1usion Med,2013,3(4):195-199.
[8]
Zhao K,Pan Y,Guess PC,et al.Inf1uence of veneer app1ication on fracture behavior of 1ithium-disi1icate-based ceramic crowns[J].Dent Mater,2012,28(6):653-660.
[9]
Ichim I,Kuzmanovic D,Love RM.A finite e1ement ana1ysis of ferru1e design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root[J].Int Endod,2013,39(6):443-452.
[13]
Bragger U,Lauchenauer D,Lang NP.Surgica1 1engthening of the c1inica1 crown[J].J C1in Periodonto1,1992,19(1):58-63.
Zeighami S,Mahgo1i H,Azari A.The effect of mu1tip1e firings on microtensi1e bond strength of core-veneer zirconia-based a11-ceramic restorations[J].J Prosthodont, 2013,22(1):49-53.
[14]
Farshad B,Ehsan G,Mahmoud S,et al.Eva1uation of resistance form of different preparation features on mandibu1ar mo1ars[J].Indian J Dent Res,2013,24(2):216-219.